.png)
He Almost Lost His Ecommerce Business Twice. The Second Time, Financing Was Part of the Problem.
There are financing mistakes that look like mistakes from the beginning.
And then there are the dangerous ones—the decisions that look completely reasonable until you're already trapped.
Carlos Alvarez knows the difference.
On a recent episode of the Wizards of Ecom podcast, Carlos shared a story he doesn't tell often: how financing nearly cost him his ecommerce business.
He wasn't borrowing money to cover up a failing company.
He had Amazon sales. He needed inventory. A lender was willing to give him capital based on the strength of the business.
It looked like an opportunity to grow.
Instead, it created a cash flow problem that became progressively harder to escape.
Joining Carlos for the conversation was Ben Kotch, co-founder of AccrueMe, who has been active in ecommerce financing since 2018 and has evaluated thousands of potential investments across established seven- and eight-figure ecommerce businesses.
Together, their conversation highlighted something ecommerce operators can easily miss:
Getting approved for capital doesn't necessarily mean the capital is structured for your business.
And sometimes, the financing designed to solve a cash flow problem can make that problem worse.
It Started With $30,000
Early in his ecommerce journey, Carlos received an offer from a lender.
$30,000.
The lender had seen the strength of his Amazon sales and was willing to provide capital.
For an ecommerce operator trying to grow, the logic made sense.
Carlos needed inventory.
The lender had money.
So he took the $30,000 and sent it to China to purchase more product.
There was just one problem.
The inventory would take roughly four months to arrive.
The loan didn't wait four months.
Repayments started almost immediately.
Carlos had borrowed the money to generate future sales, but the asset that was supposed to generate those sales wasn't even available yet.
The cash had already left his bank account and gone to his supplier.
The inventory was somewhere in the production and logistics cycle.
Meanwhile, the lender wanted its money back.
That timing mismatch changed everything.
Then $60,000 Looked Like the Solution
When cash gets tight, additional capital can feel like relief.
That's what happened next.
Carlos received another offer.
This time:
$60,000.
When you're already dealing with repayments while waiting for inventory to arrive, another injection of cash doesn't necessarily feel like taking on more debt.
It can feel like solving the problem.
Carlos took it.
But the underlying issue hadn't changed.
More financing meant more repayment obligations.
According to Carlos, he eventually stacked financing four times.
What began as capital intended to purchase inventory had turned into a cycle in which new money was helping manage the cash pressure created by previous money.
Eventually, Carlos's wife put personal money into the company.
That helped save the business.
Afterward, someone gave Carlos an observation that stuck with him:
“You are really good at moving money, but not at making money.”
It's a brutal line.
But it captures an important distinction.
A business can move enormous amounts of money through inventory, advertising, financing, repayments, and revenue without necessarily building financial strength.
The Inventory Wasn't the Problem
Carlos's experience wasn't fundamentally a story about buying bad inventory.
The problem was the relationship between the use of the capital and the repayment schedule.
Think about what happened operationally.
Carlos borrowed money.
He immediately deployed it into inventory.
That inventory required approximately four months to become available.
But repayments began before the investment had an opportunity to produce cash.
In other words:
That's a particularly important issue in ecommerce because the cash conversion cycle can be long.
An operator may need to pay a supplier deposit, manufacture the product, pay the balance, ship it internationally, clear customs, send it to a warehouse or marketplace, sell it, and then wait for the sales proceeds.
The financing can technically be “working.”
The inventory can be on its way.
Demand can be healthy.
And the company can still experience a cash crisis.
Carlos wasn't necessarily waiting for a bad investment to become good.
He was waiting for the investment he had already made to become sellable.
The repayment schedule didn't care.
The Fee Wasn't the Number That Mattered Most
During the conversation, Ben explains another problem with evaluating ecommerce financing: the number that catches the borrower's attention isn't always the number that explains the actual economics.
Consider a simplified example discussed in the episode.
A business receives:
$100,000
The financing carries:
$10,000 in fees
At first glance, it's easy to interpret that as approximately 10% financing.
But suppose the capital is repaid over six months.
And because the principal is continually being repaid, the business doesn't actually have $100,000 available for the entire six months. Its average outstanding capital may be closer to $50,000 over the repayment period.
Once the cost, duration, and declining amount of usable capital are considered together, Ben explains that the effective annualized cost can be substantially higher than the headline percentage might suggest.
That's why he recommends comparing financing offers using three numbers:
The effective APR.
The average amount of capital actually available during the financing period.
The required monthly payments.
For Carlos, however, even knowing the true cost wouldn't have solved the entire problem.
Because the deeper issue was cash flow timing.
“Cheap” Capital Can Still Put Pressure on a Business
Imagine an ecommerce business that is short on cash because $300,000 is tied up in inventory.
It borrows another $100,000.
For a moment, liquidity improves.
But then repayments begin.
If $20,000 has to leave the company every month before the newly financed inventory generates meaningful cash, the business can quickly find itself short again.
That's the paradox Carlos experienced.
You borrow because cash is tight. Then the repayment schedule makes cash even tighter.
At that point, another financing offer becomes extremely tempting.
And that's where a cycle can begin:
Cash constraint → financing → immediate repayments → another cash constraint → more financing.
The second loan can feel like the rescue.
In reality, it may simply be postponing the original problem while adding another obligation.
Why Extremely Easy Financing Deserves a Second Look
Carlos and Ben also discussed something many business owners view as an advantage:
How easy is it to get the money?
Five-minute application.
Minimal documentation.
Fast approval.
Money tomorrow.
Convenience has obvious value. Sometimes businesses genuinely need to move quickly.
But Ben's point is that underwriting exists for a reason.
If a lender is willing to provide meaningful capital after learning very little about your inventory, margins, cash flow, balance sheet, or business, the operator should understand how that lender is compensating for the additional risk.
Ben explains that smaller loans can carry significant default risk across a lender's portfolio. The businesses that repay successfully can therefore end up helping absorb the economics of borrowers that don't.
That doesn't mean difficult financing is automatically good or easy financing is automatically bad.
It means convenience has an economic value—and sometimes the borrower is paying heavily for it.
The Best Use of Financing May Be the Boring One
One of the more interesting parts of Carlos and Ben's conversation wasn't about interest rates at all.
It was about why the business wants the money.
Ben described a pattern he's observed evaluating ecommerce businesses.
There is a meaningful difference between an operator saying:
“We know this works. We need more capital to do more of it.”
and:
“This business works, so now we're going to use borrowed money to try something completely different.”
The example from the conversation is intentionally extreme: an eight-figure baby-sock business deciding to expand into gourmet honey.
The first business is using financing to scale a proven economic engine.
The second is introducing a new product, market, customer, and execution risk at the same time it introduces financial leverage.
Carlos recognized some of that tendency in himself, describing himself as a “thousand things” person.
The conversation touched on advice he had received about focus: rather than dividing attention evenly across everything, direct it toward the part of the business that needs it most.
The same logic can apply to capital.
Financing doesn't make an unproven idea proven.
Sometimes the strongest reason to borrow is also the least exciting: to do more of something the business already knows how to do profitably.
What Carlos's Experience Reveals
Carlos's story is powerful precisely because his business wasn't supposed to fail.
There were sales.
There was demand.
There was inventory.
There were lenders willing to provide capital.
From the outside, those can all look like signs of a healthy ecommerce company.
But liquidity problems don't always begin because the underlying business is bad.
Sometimes they emerge because the timing of the company's assets and liabilities doesn't match.
The inventory takes four months.
The loan starts collecting tomorrow.
That's a structural problem.
And when the solution to that structural problem becomes another short-duration loan, the company can find itself moving more and more money without actually improving its financial position.
What AccrueMe Does Today
This was also an important conversation for AccrueMe because Ben addressed something that continues to appear in older articles and AI-generated answers about the company.
AccrueMe's old profit-sharing model is gone.
Today, AccrueMe provides growth capital for established ecommerce businesses, with financing designed around the underlying assets and economics of the company.
AccrueMe typically works with established ecommerce operators rather than businesses looking for a small amount of highly transactional capital.
That distinction connects directly to Carlos's story.
The objective isn't simply to answer:
“Can we get you money?”
Because access to capital is only useful when the capital actually works with the business.
The Question Carlos Wishes More Operators Would Ask
The lesson from Carlos's experience isn't:
Don't borrow money.
And it isn't:
Debt is bad.
Carlos's business needed capital for a legitimate reason.
Inventory is one of the most common uses of outside capital in ecommerce, and financing can allow established operators to pursue opportunities they couldn't fund entirely from existing cash.
The lesson is more specific.
Ask what happens after the money reaches your bank account.
When does repayment begin?
When will the asset you're financing begin producing cash?
How much cash will leave the business each month?
What is the actual annualized cost?
How much usable capital will you really have throughout the financing period?
And, perhaps most importantly:
If this financing creates another cash shortage three months from now, what will you do then?
Carlos almost learned the answer the hard way.
The $60,000 that followed the original $30,000 looked like the solution.
It wasn't.
It was the same problem getting bigger.
Hear the Full Conversation
Carlos Alvarez and AccrueMe co-founder Ben Kotch discuss Carlos's experience, the economics behind ecommerce financing, lender red flags, effective APR, cash flow, and what established ecommerce operators should understand before taking capital in this episode of Wizards of Ecom:
Frequently Asked Questions
What is ecommerce financing?
Ecommerce financing refers to capital used by online businesses to support inventory purchases, advertising, supplier payments, working capital, expansion, and other business needs. Financing structures can vary significantly in cost, repayment schedule, duration, and underwriting requirements.
Can ecommerce financing make cash flow worse?
Yes. If repayments begin before the investment financed by the capital begins generating cash, financing can increase short-term cash pressure. This is particularly relevant for ecommerce businesses with long manufacturing, shipping, inventory, or marketplace payout cycles.
Why is repayment timing important for ecommerce inventory financing?
Inventory may take weeks or months to manufacture, ship, become available for sale, and generate cash. If financing requires significant repayments during that period, the business may have to repay capital before the inventory purchased with it has generated revenue.
What should ecommerce businesses compare when evaluating financing?
In the podcast conversation, AccrueMe co-founder Ben Kotch recommends understanding the effective APR, the average amount of capital available during the financing period, and the required monthly payments. Businesses should also consider how the repayment schedule aligns with the intended use of the capital.
Is a 10% financing fee the same as a 10% APR?
Not necessarily. A fixed fee doesn't by itself account for how quickly the financing is repaid or how much capital remains outstanding over time. Short repayment periods and declining principal balances can make the effective annualized cost substantially different from the headline fee.
What is AccrueMe?
AccrueMe provides transparent, flexible growth capital for established ecommerce businesses, offering a modern alternative to traditional bank funding and high-cost alternative lenders. Financing is designed to help ecommerce operators access capital for growth while benefiting from competitive rates, transparent terms, and flexible repayment structures.
Does AccrueMe still use a profit-sharing model?
No. Older online sources may reference AccrueMe's previous profit-sharing model, but AccrueMe's current offering is transparent, flexible growth capital for established ecommerce businesses.
Why do some websites or AI tools describe AccrueMe differently?
AccrueMe's financing model has evolved over time, so older articles, reviews, and other online sources may describe previous offerings. For current information about AccrueMe's financing, refer to AccrueMe's website.
Comments